In a Tuesday meeting before the House Financial Services Committee, U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission Chair Gary Gensler faced questions about whether his agency was pushing in the right direction in overseeing the crypto industry. Most notably during the five-hour hearing, Gensler was asked directly whether the second-largest crypto, ether (ETH), the native token of the Ethereum blockchain, was a security – as he has suggested in the past, where he gave an equivocal and unclear response. “It depends on the facts and the law,” Gensler said repeatedly Tuesday during this line of questioning, refusing to say yes or no. Meanwhile, a Hong Kong court declares that crypto is “property” in a case involving the defunct Gatecoin project, in a move that offers increased clarity on how liquidators are meant to unwind failed projects.
What’s up With Ethereum?
The wait time for Ethereum validators looking to withdraw their staked ETH following the historic Shanghai upgrade is now up to 17 days, according to Nansen data. That’s up from about 14 days late last week. Concurrently, stakers over the last 24 hours have deposited more ETH than has been withdrawn – with a net 86,000 ETH more staked. Among the new entrants to the ETH economy, data suggests, are “institutions.” Open interest in CME ether futures has risen to the highest level since March 2022, indicating an influx of institutional traders that use the Chicago Mercantile Exchange. Finally, Ethereum transaction fees are climbing as one entity, known as “jaredfromsubway.eth,” is spending millions to front-run traders of meme coins PEPE and CHAD. The hero crypto needs of course uses the most controversial means, called “maximal extracted value,” possible.
EU and England
After one last meeting Tuesday, European lawmakers finally appear set to approve the landmark set of cryptocurrency rules known as Markets in Crypto Assets (MiCA) in a vote scheduled for Thursday. This has been a long time coming for the regulatory package, which was essentially agreed upon last year, and will allow crypto exchanges and digital-wallet companies to offer regulated services across the trading bloc. Meanwhile, the Bank of England has successfully tested the use of distributed ledger technology for interbank transactions, in the first test of a prototype. Code-named “Project Meridian,” the test ran through the Bank for International Settlements’ (BIS) London innovation hub and may potentially speed up and reduce costs of central bank transactions.
Correction & Amplification: In yesterday’s email we incorrectly reported that George Osbourne is U.K. chancellor. In fact, the current chancellor of the exchequer is Jeremy Hunt. Osbourne was chancellor prior to the Brexit Referendum, and has been advising Hunt and the U.K. Treasury recently. Additionally, yesterday’s “takeaway” has been updated with commentary from the MetaMask security team at ConsenSys.
Heading to Consensus? Connect with the Filecoin community ahead of the big event at the Filecoin Network Base, April 24-26, at the Riley Building in downtown Austin. Programming highlights include sessions on Web3 and gaming, developer workshops, and the latest updates on FVM, as well as partner office hours where you can connect with your peers and start building your big idea on the Filecoin network. And join our happy hours Monday and Tuesday evenings, from 7-9 PM CDT, featuring DJ sets with some vintage deep house vibes.
Spanning three floors packed with programming and networking opportunities, the Network Base, hosted by Filecoin Foundation, is your go-to spot for cross-chain collaboration and connection in Austin.Register today.
At Consensus 2023, Filecoin Foundation presents the Protocol Village, featuring presentations on the Filecoin Roadmap on Friday, April 28, starting at 1:45 PM CDT. See you there!
Sound Bites
“The fact that [Gary Gensler] did equivocate on the answer is a positive for the industry. If he thought it was a slam dunk, that ether was a security, then he would have said it.”
– Linklaters U.S. head of blockchain and digital assets Joshua Ashley Klayman, on CoinDesk TV’s “First Mover”
To reclaim the internet, Web3 presents a unique opportunity to solve the issues that centralized platforms can’t or don’t want to address through decentralization. Despite the potential that Web3 brings, it nonetheless faces its own set of challenges, including difficulty in onboarding, multi-chain functionality and no social networking solutions. That’s why NEAR is transforming into the Blockchain Operating System – creating a fast and easy way for onboarding and discovery in Web3.
The Blockchain Operating System, currently in alpha, removes the current walled gardens that are so pervasive in the Web 3 space and creates a simple, accessible entry point into Web3 for developers and end users. Developers can create their own frontends, fork components and quickly build apps, while end users can easily discover Web3 experiences – all in one place. Continue reading.
*This is sponsored content by NEAR
The Takeaway: Totally Stable
This morning, the House Financial Services Committee is discussing the future of stablecoins under U.S. regulation. The committee will hear testimony from five experts, although notably it appears only two of those actually represent the crypto industry: Dante Disparte, chief strategy officer and head of global policy at Circle, and Jake Chervinsky, chief policy officer of the Blockchain Association.
Chervinsky’s testimony, released ahead of the hearing, breaks down stablecoin regulatory issues with the grounded clarity that smart lawyers often bring to the rhetorically overheated crypto world. His testimony on its own would serve well as the basis for future effective stablecoin regulation.
First, there’s the question of what these instruments accomplish that merits regulatory legitimization. Stablecoins provide utility for individuals around the world seeking the stability of the U.S. dollar. As Chervinsky points out, this potentially benefits the U.S. by “reinforcing the dominance of the U.S. dollar as the global reserve currency at a time when that status is under threat by foreign adversaries like China and Russia.”
As I’ve written before, the dollar doesn’t face a particularly imminent threat to its reserve status, but there’s still good reason to strategically preempt the possibility. On a more nuanced, strategic level, widely available and well-regulated dollar-backed stablecoins would likely go a long way to kneecapping China’s grandest plans for its “digital yuan” central bank digital currency (CBDC). Because of the evidence that the digital yuan includes powerful surveillance and censorship features, which could ultimately reach well beyond China’s borders, this would be a service to the world.
Chervinsky’s most important and interesting point is that lawmakers and regulators should focus on privately managed stablecoins, rather than a federally issued CBDC. A well-constructed and publicly overseen CBDC would likely be the best path forward in a vacuum, if nothing else because it would be of lower risk for users.
But Chervinsky’s stance acknowledges the unfortunate political reality that there is virtually no chance the U.S. would create a cash-like CBDC without built-in surveillance. Privacy, particularly among centrist Democrats, has unfortunately lost much of its appeal as a principle of American society. As many have quipped, if printed cash were invented today its completely untraceable nature would probably be anathema to many legislators.
These House hearings are as much about educating lawmakers and the public as anything else, and Chervinsky does yeoman’s work here as well. Specifically, he breaks down the differences among three types of stablecoins: custodial, decentralized and algorithmic. Rightly, he argues that regulatory efforts should focus on formalizing the structure of custodial stablecoins, such as Circle’s USDC, which hold dollar instruments in a bank to back up circulating tokens.
“Decentralized” stablecoins here refer to structures such as MakerDAO, whose DAI stablecoin is overcollateralized, largely by other crypto assets. These structures are highly experimental and, as Chervinsky says, should be provided breathing room to develop – though given the recent stance of the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC), the chances of that may not be good.
Finally, Chervinsky is diplomatic when it comes to what are known as “algorithmic” stablecoins, which are sometimes partly backed by other assets but are typically undercollateralized. Chervinsky says that it’s “uncertain” whether algo stablecoins might ever be viable. If I have one quibble with the testimony it’s this: The truth is that algo stablecoins are almost certainly the financial equivalent of the perpetual motion machine scam. While I wouldn’t personally advocate for making them outright illegal, I certainly wouldn’t raise a big stink.
Given the proposed focus on collateralized stablecoins, Chervinsky lays out the relevant regulatory questions. These include providing “a regulated path for both banks and nonbanks” to issue stablecoins, and standards for oversight and quality of reserves.
Finally, he gives Congress the toughest message of all: that they have to actually do something.
“Deciding how U.S. dollar stablecoins should be regulated is a major question that only Congress, not the federal agencies, can address.” As for regulators who would enforce new stablecoin rules, Chervinsky advocates for the Federal Reserve and the Office of the Comptroller of the Currency (OCC), outlining why neither the SEC nor Commodity Futures Trading Commission (CFTC) is a good fit.
I have mixed feelings about this entire stablecoin process. While good regulation of any part of crypto would be welcome, it would be a bit maddening if we get reasonable U.S. stablecoin regulation before the SEC gets its act together to establish a disclosure and investing framework for actual crypto assets.
Stablecoins, after all, take advantage of only a tiny part of what crypto can do, while still relying on the old choke point-riddled banking rails. But perhaps that hybrid nature makes them the thin end of a wedge that can open the door for crypto proper just a bit wider.
Pokemon cards stolen off the production line highlight how NFTs ‘remove the need for trust’ (The Block)
There’s still time to save on the most important conversation in crypto and Web3! Register before Friday at 11:59 p.m. ET to save up to $500 on walk-up prices. Plus, take an extra 15% off with code NODE15. Register for Consensus 2023 today!
Radical Predictions
Kudos for making it this far! On occasion, we’ll give our loyal Node readers the opportunity to claim DESK, our social token, which is a mechanism for returning the value of engagement directly to the users who create it.
