Defunct crypto exchange FTX could be restarted for some non-U.S. users, according to a new court filing. FTX’s bankruptcy administrators have filed a proposed plan that would reorganize its creditors (those who are owed money in the bankruptcy process) into different classes – including “dotcom customers,” U.S. customers and a few other groupings based on priority. Notably, FTT token holders are not included in the groupings, and should overseas clients want to reform FTX with third party support – they would be legally entitled. Meanwhile, Binance Japan, a subsidiary of the global exchange, will begin onboarding users in the country on its newly launched platform. The exchange was warned by regulators that it was operating in the country without permission two years ago.
A message from Bitget
Join the world’s largest crypto copy trading platform!
Now everyone can trade like a pro! Bitget lets you copy proven strategies from over 100,000 elite traders for free, helping you take advantage of the market without having to rack up years of crypto experience.
Rumors are circulating that the creator of BALD – a “meme coin” that went live on Coinbase’s L2 Base and ended up being a scam after raising $68 million from traders – is none other than FTX founder Sam Bankman-Fried. According to wallet forensics that found interactions with FTX, Alameda Research and a few DeFi protocols SBF was known to use as well as writing sample comparisons, some people are convinced SBF pulled the rug on the token. Though others disagree, considering the terms of SBF’s bail restrict his internet access. BALD, which is thought to reference Coinbase CEO Brian Armstrong’s hairstyle (or lack thereof), gained 4,000,000% (again, before the rug pull) helping to bring some $68 million in ETH to Coinbase’s Base chain, which will officially launch later this year.
Sometimes a Security
A federal judge denied LUNA/UST developer Terraform Labs’ motion to dismiss the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) lawsuit, saying the regulator has jurisdiction and “asserted a plausible claim” to sue the South Korea-based firm. Terraform lawyers referenced Ripple Labs’ partial victory over the SEC (which found that XRP is not necessarily a security), in its legal defense. The SEC sued Terraform and founder Do Kwon on charges of misleading investors about the defunct UST “stablecoin” and fraud. Meanwhile, investment bank Berenberg said Terraform’s loss does not bode well for crypto exchange Coinbase, which is being sued by the SEC and may look to the Ripple case for its defense. In a separate legal maneuver, the U.S. Internal Revenue Service (IRS) said Monday staking rewards will be taxed as income, as opposed to levying capital gains taxes after staking rewards are sold or transferred.
The Takeaway: DeFi Died, We Didn’t Notice
(Michael Egorov)
Decentralized finance (DeFi) died yesterday. No protocols actually failed or tokens crashed to zero – though that was a distinct possibility. The interlinked economy of intermediary-less lenders, exchanges and trading tools is still, technically speaking, chugging along. But the spirit that propelled DeFi forward, the dream of disintermediating money from power and providing easy access to basic and complex financial products without fear or favor is dead. And it wasn’t the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) that did it, but DeFi itself.
On Monday, following a significant if not particularly lucrative series of attacks on several DeFi platforms including the systemically important Curve Finance, Curve founder Michael Egorov found himself in a precarious position as hundreds of millions of worth of personal loans he took out were in danger of liquidation.
Months earlier, Egorov had massively leveraged up on CRV tokens he earned from his role helping to launch Curve, one of the most used decentralized exchanges. In one loan, on open lending protocol Aave alone, Egorov had put something like 34% of the total supply of CRV tokens on the table to take out $63 million worth of stablecoins. He was active elsewhere, loaning out as much as 460 million CRV tokens – or 47% of the total supply – for $110 million.
The hack of at least three Curve trading pools on Sunday had put downward pressure on those loans, and had CRV dropped below a certain price (~$0.35) it would have triggered the programmatic sell off of Egorov’s loan collateral. That would have likely kicked off a vicious cycle where the CRV price would continue to drop, forcing other loans into liquidation, which would cause CRV to drop even lower. That’s what’s known as a “death spiral.” CRV is used as collateral across the DeFi ecosystem, and the fallout could have brought the sector to its knees.
None of this came to pass, however, due to a series of behind-the-scene deals Egorov made last night with monied traders like TRON founder Justin Sun. He was able to pay off some of his debt, and buoy the price of CRV (now trading at around $.60).
Other people were pushing for platform founders like Aave CEO Stani Kulechov to intervene in the markets – not by disabling the protocol necessarily, but possibly tapping into an Aave insurance fund or using a Safety Module that can be flipped on in extreme situations (the system that Aave stakers actually pay into). This wouldn’t have been the first time a DeFi giant like Egorov would have been bailed out or the first time bad judgment caught up with someone in crypto.
Even more, Egorov arguably did nothing wrong: He followed the pre-written rules of a few loan making platforms to do what is essentially crypto’s version of a popular tax-minimizing technique in the larger tech sector. If “paper billionaires” like Peter Thiel go to banks to take out cash loans by pledging the stock equity they’ve built up by founding or investing in startups like Facebook, why can’t crypto founders do the same? That’s the name of the permissionless finance game.
But given how close DeFi came to death, it’s worth asking hard questions. Why exactly was Egorov allowed to amass nearly half the total CRV supply – a situation that is on the surface entirely antithetical to the supposed egalitarian aims of DeFi? Why did no one intervene earlier? Why was such a critically important protocol allowed to be jeopardized? Why don’t lending protocols like Aave or Fraxlend (where Egorov’s loan was smaller, but at greater risk of going bad), have caps on the number, or percentage, of tokens people can borrow against?
Perhaps most importantly, as my colleague, Shaurya Malwa, suggested, why did “Richie rich devs” wait until the last minute for calamity to strike to take action? It’s not like this was a big secret. Research group Gauntlet was sending out warning signs as early as January about Egorov’s highly-leveraged financial position, though its formal proposal to freeze CRV on Aave V2 did not pass. Venture capitalists behind ParaFi, Framework and 1kx even sued Egorov this year, not because of his dangerous loan book but because they felt they were owed a greater equity stake in Curve as early backers.
The simple answer: it’s DeFi. Despite being based on a series of technically innovative, open source and interoperable protocols, it suffers from the same fundamental issues as the traditional finance sector. Greed is rampant. Hypocrisy is the norm. And as Dublin University assistant professor Paul Dylan-Ennis put it: DeFi’s ethos isn’t to build democratically, but only “so long as it’s working.”
This column could just as easily be written as a hero’s account of Egorov’s intervention, and the coming together of industry participants (who aren’t always naturally aligned) to rescue a highly important platform. Egorov’s scrambling yesterday to shore up bad debt was in some sense trading wizardry – he repaid a 5.13 million FRAX stablecoin loan with money that was practically found under the couch cushions. Egorov didn’t respond to a request for comment, but certainly he understood the gravity of the situation and, in many ways, I’m glad he pulled through.
But none of this is heroic. If DeFi was ever really different, it’s now run by a few massive bag-holders. If it was ever really defiant, it’s now almost totally useless to everyday crypto holders who far from making money “yield farming” often get swallowed by trading fees and impossible things to understand like impermanent loss. There’s a real trend within crypto media and on Crypto Twitter to discuss any time something goes wrong in the industry as just another chaotic day. We all have brain worms from being online, ha ha, and cannot even comprehend the disappearance of $70 million anymore, ha ha. Is financial pain even real? Well, not really for me, ha ha, but look at how gross Caroline Ellison is, ha ha.
The flippant attitude to ever-present crime and calamity makes sense because cryptocurrencies are literally fake internet money. Was it always a mistake to imbue them with any meaning beyond that?
As Web3 continues to evolve, venture capital (VC) will play an increasingly important role in supporting innovation and driving growth. VC provides a powerful boost for early-stage projects, which benefit not only from the funds needed to build and launch, but also from the advice of experienced entrepreneurs and investors in the space who can help navigate the complex landscape.
But not all VC firms are equal. Some invest in early-stage companies, while others invest in later-stage ones. Some have a specific investment thesis, while others are more opportunistic. That’s why it’s important to find a VC firm that aligns with your goals.
MEXC Ventures, the investment arm of the leading global crypto exchange and trading platform MEXC, checks all boxes.
It is now more important than ever to set industry standards and align on practical short-term and long-term objectives through pointed conversations with the best legal minds and Washington D.C.’s most important decision makers.
Join us at State of Crypto: Policy and Regulation on October 24 in Washington D.C. for an unprecedented opportunity to evaluate, dissect and ultimately shape crypto regulatory frameworks that support a vibrant, secure and healthy future for the digital economy.
