The Bears New Stadium Deal Offers More Questions Than Answers + Thoughts On Deion Sanders, Jay Monahan, Russell Wi…
Hey, Friends! One of the things that always amazes me is how the NFL has turned itself into a 24/7/365 business. There are no days off. Between draft season and free agency, every fanbase looks forward to the future, and debate shows fill their time with NFL content despite the NBA, NHL, and March Madness being in full swing. Still, this week, the Bears stole the show, announcing a new indoor stadium project on the lakefront in Chicago. This deal is equally complex as it is interesting, so we’ll dig into all of it today. Plus, we’ll chat through Deion Sanders’ early financial impact at Colorado, Russell Wilson’s $50 million real estate problem, Nick Saban’s most recent comments on NIL, and more. Let’s get right into it! The Hurry Up: What I’m Thinking/Hearing/Watching…
The Bears New Stadium Deal Offers More Questions Than AnswersOn Monday, the NFL’s Chicago Bears confirmed they would be building a new stadium on Chicago’s lakefront near Soldier Field. The new stadium will reportedly include a $2 billion private investment from the team and a dome, allowing the city to potentially host premium events like the Super Bowl and Final Four. This is welcomed news for fans. The team’s current stadium, Soldier Field, is 100 years old and by far the NFL’s oldest stadium. It’s also the NFL’s smallest stadium at 61,500 seats, and a new venue could drastically increase the team’s annual revenue. However, I’m still not convinced this is going to happen. Building a stadium directly south of Soldier Field is a logistical nightmare for fans, and anyone who has followed Chicago politics over the years knows how impossible it is to build on the lakefront. Another thing to keep in mind is that the city and its taxpayers would own this stadium despite the Bears contributing $2 billion of personal money. This is a *highly unusual* arrangement, as most professional sports teams in the United States like to subsidize the cost of stadiums via taxpayer funds while privatizing the subsequent profit via franchise valuation growth. That’s not to say it couldn’t work. A potential scenario, for example, might include Chicago giving up the land for free to build the stadium, providing the team with free rent in perpetuity, and offering them tax breaks on the $2 billion construction investment. But it’s also important to remember that there is no such thing as a free lunch, and when things don’t add up financially, it’s typically for a reason. Instead, it feels like the Bears might be using this announcement as leverage. Many of you will remember that the team previously purchased a 326-acre plot of land for $197.2 million in Arlington Heights, a suburb 25 miles northwest of the city. The Bears sold everyone on a grand vision, including a multi-billion-dollar privately funded stadium with a surrounding entertainment district. But then Arlington Heights increased the property’s annual tax assessment 5x from just a few years prior, despite the construction process not even starting yet, and the Bears suddenly found themselves looking at a $100 million higher property tax bill than they expected. “The property’s original assessment at five times the 2021 tax value, and the recent settlement with Churchill Downs [the property’s former owner] for 2022 being three times higher, fails to reflect the property is not operational and not commercially viable in its current state,” the Bears said in a statement in June 2023. The Bears (obviously) weren’t happy about this and have been negotiating with Arlington Heights since. In fact, after the Bears announced their plans for a new stadium on the lakefront earlier this week, the village of Arlington Heights released a statement saying they had spoken with the team and received assurances that the Bears’ interest in building a new stadium in Arlington Heights had not changed. “The Village of Arlington Heights is aware of media reports regarding a proposed Chicago Bears stadium concept in Chicago. Village officials spoke with the Chicago Bears Football Club today, and while they are evaluating all of their options, they confirmed that their continued interest in Arlington Park has not changed.” The unpopular truth is that we don’t know what will happen next. I feel comfortable saying that because I have seen enough stadium deals fall through or change entirely over the years, and sometimes it’s best to wait for more answers. Chicago Bears president and CEO Kevin Warren dealt with a similar situation when he was with the Minnesota Vikings. In 2011, the Vikings had a deal to build their new stadium in Arden Hills, a suburb just outside Minneapolis. That deal fell through, though, and the Vikings shifted their focus to downtown Minneapolis, building a billion-dollar stadium with about half the money coming from taxpayers. I tell you this because maybe it offers some indication of what the Bears might do in the future, with Warren previously ditching a suburban stadium in favor of a downtown project. However, the most important thing to remember is that sports ownership has changed a lot over the last few years. The most valuable teams now operate like real estate companies, owning their venues and building mixed-use developments nearby. The Atlanta Braves are probably the best example. In 2017, they left Atlanta for a new stadium in Cobb County called Truist Park. It was only 12 miles up the road, but it allowed them to build “The Battery,” a 75-acre mixed-use development surrounding Truist Park that includes restaurants, shops, hotels, and more. This wasn’t a vanity project, either. The Battery is now the Braves’ third-largest revenue category, generating $59 million in additional revenue last year and growing faster than any of the team’s baseball-specific categories, including television rights, ticket sales, merchandise, and licensing deals. Many teams have copied this model since — and it provides the perfect example of how a big-market franchise like the Bears could maximize value by owning their own real estate. If you enjoyed this breakdown, please consider sharing it with your friends. Also, I recently started a sports business community on Microsoft Teams. There are a few hundred of us in there so far, and it has become a great place to share articles and discuss interesting topics. Join us! I hope everyone has a great day. We’ll talk on Friday. Your feedback helps me improve Huddle Up. How did you like today’s post? Loved | Great | Good | Meh | Bad Huddle Up is a 3x weekly newsletter that breaks down the business and money behind sports. If you are not already a subscriber, sign up and join 120,000+ others who receive it directly in their inbox each week. You’re currently a free subscriber to Huddle Up. For the full experience, upgrade your subscription.
© 2024 |